FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al

Filing 319

Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. PROCEDURAL ORDER. On October 4, 2012, this court allowed the filing of one additional summary judgment motion by defendant Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly). In accordance with LR. 7.1, the supportin g memorandum is limited to 20 pages, double spaced with 12 point typeset. The opposition shall be subject to the same limits. The LR. 56.1 statements shall be limited to 15 pages each. There shall be no reply briefs. Supporting exhibits and affidavits for the supporting memorandum shall be limited to 30 pages for the total filing. The supporting exhibits and affidavits in support of the opposition are subject to the same parameters. (Feeney, Eileen)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
MICHELE FECHO, et al,
Plaintiffs,
v.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
11-10152-MBB

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, et al,
Defendants.
PROCEDURAL ORDER
October 5, 2012

BOWLER, U.S.M.J.
On October 4, 2012, this court allowed the filing of one
additional summary judgment motion by defendant Eli Lilly and
Company (“Lilly”).

In accordance with LR. 7.1, the supporting

memorandum is limited to 20 pages, double spaced with 12 point
typeset.

The opposition shall be subject to the same limits.

The LR. 56.1 statements shall be limited to 15 pages each.
shall be no reply briefs.

There

Supporting exhibits and affidavits for

the supporting memorandum shall be limited to 30 pages for the
total filing.

The supporting exhibits and affidavits in support

of the opposition are subject to the same parameters.
/s/ Marianne B. Bowler
MARIANNE B. BOWLER
United States Magistrate Judge

2