Deagle v. EEOC et al
Filing
6
Judge Nancy Gertner: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL: for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 5), and for the failure of Deagle to comply with the directives of this Court, it is hereby Ordered that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED in its entirety.(PSSA, 1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
DEBRA A, DEAGLE,
Plaintiff,
V.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-10278-NG
EEOC, ET AL.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
GERTNER, D.J.
On February 11, 2011, Plaintiff Debra A. Deagle (“Deagle”) filed a self-prepared
Complaint against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and two
individuals, Jacqueline Harris and Tom Curran, both employees of the Executive Office of
Health and Human Services (“EOHHS”) in Boston, Massachusetts.
On March 2, 2011, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 5) directing
Deagle to demonstrate good cause within 35 days why this action should not be dismissed for the
reasons stated therein. In brief, the Court noted the apparent lack of jurisdiction over her claims,
as well as the failure to state plausible claims in accordance with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
To date, Deagle has failed to file a response to the Memorandum and Order as directed,
and the time period for doing so has lapsed.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 5), and
for the failure of Deagle to comply with the directives of this Court, it is hereby Ordered that the
above-captioned matter is DISMISSED in its entirety.
A separate Order for Dismissal shall enter.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Gertner
NANCY GERTNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED: April 19, 2011
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?