San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Franklin Sports, Inc

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/23/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)

San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Franklin Sports, Inc

Doc. 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
san francisco, ca 94111-4213 fax [phone]

HOWARD A. SLAVITT (State Bar # 172840) COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94111-4213 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] MICHAEL A. ALBERT (admitted pro hac vice) GERALD B. HRYCYSZYN (State Bar # 227814) WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C. 600 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02210-2206 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 617-646-8646 E-mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Franklin Sports, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiff, vs. FRANKLIN SPORTS, INC. Defendant. Case No. C10-05210 PJH STIPULATION OF TRANSFER AND ORDER Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

One Ferry Building, Suite 200, [phone] ·

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP

Case No. 10-cv-05210 PJH STIPULATION OF TRANSFER

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
san francisco, ca 94111-4213 fax [phone]

Plaintiff San Francisco Technology, Inc. ("SF Tech") and Defendant Franklin Sports, Inc. ("Franklin"), by and through their respective counsel, jointly stipulate as follows. WHEREAS Franklin filed a motion seeking dismissal of SF Tech's claims against Franklin pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) and 12(b)(6), and, in the alternative, to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (D.I. 19). WHEREAS SF Tech does not oppose Franklin' request to transfer venue to the District of s Massachusetts. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for the undersigned parties as follows: 1. The court may transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts; and 2. Franklin's Motion to Dismiss is deferred for ruling by the District of Massachusetts.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

One Ferry Building, Suite 200, [phone] ·

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS, LLP

SIGNATURES In accordance with General Order 45.X.B., Gerald B. Hrycyszyn, counsel for Franklin, attests that each other signatory listed below has concurred in this filing.

Date: March 23, 2011

Mount, Spelman & Fingerman, P.C., /s/ Daniel H. Fingerman Counsel for San Francisco Technology, Inc. Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. /s/ Gerald B. Hrycyszyn Counsel for Franklin Sports Inc.

Date: March 23, 2011

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. This case will be transferred to the District of Massachusetts and the Motion to Dismiss deferred for ruling by the District of Massachusetts.
CT TE C 3/23/11 TA Dated: _____________________________ __________________________________ HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTONED ER O ORD IT IS S United States District Judge

S DISTRI

RT U O

UNIT ED

S

Case No. 10-cv-05210 PJH STIPULATION OF TRANSFER

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge P

hyllis J.

Hamilto

n

R NIA

NO

1

RT

H