Niemic v. Clark et al

Filing 25

Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. After a reviewing the Parties' written submissions, this court hereby orders that Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement 23 is ALLOWED for the reasons stated therein. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants and Motion for a More Definite Statement 24 is thus DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KEITH NIEMIC, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD CLARKE, et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * Civil Action No. 11-10863-JLT ORDER October 25, 2011 TAURO, J. After reviewing the Parties’ written submissions, this court hereby orders that Defendants’ Motion for a More Definite Statement[#23] is ALLOWED for the reasons stated therein. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants Motion for a More Definite Statement[#24] is thus DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Joseph L. Tauro United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?