POM Wonderful LLC v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. et al

Filing 17

Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered.After a Hearing held on 10/25/2011, this court has determined that POM Wonderful, LLC has not provided a persuasive reason as to why Arnold Worldwide, LLC should testify at a deposition or produce documents on top ics other than: (1) Ocean Spray's Cranberry & Pomegranate Flavored Juice Blended with Three Juices from Concentrate with added Ingredients and n (2) Ocean Spray's work with Arnold targeting and investigating Pom Wonderful, LLC specifically. This Court hereby orders that : Third Party Arnold Worldwide, LLC's MOTION to Quash Subpoena 1 is ALLOWED. Arnold Worldwide, LLC must comply with the subpoena to testify at a deposition and to produce documents by Tuesday, 11/8/2011. The Depo sition and the production of documents are limited to the following topics included in this ORDER. POM Wonderful, LLC Application for Order to show Cause and to Why Third Party Arnold Worldwide, LLC Should Not Be Held in Contempt for Disobedience of Depositions Subpoena and Request for Oral Argument 7 and 8 are DENIED. Arnold Worldwide LLC's Motion to Strike POM Wonderful's Motion for Contempt 11 is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE SUBPOENA TO ARNOLD WORLDWIDE, LLC. POM WONDERFUL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Misc. A. No. 11-91182-JLT ORDER October 25, 2011 TAURO, J. After a Hearing held on October 25, 2011, this court has determined that Pom Wonderful, LLC has not provided a persuasive reason as to why Arnold Worldwide, LLC should testify at a deposition or produce documents on topics other than: (1) Ocean Spray’s Cranberry & Pomegranate Flavored Juice Blended with Three Juices from Concentrate with Added Ingredients1 and (2) Ocean Spray’s work with Arnold targeting and investigating Pom Wonderful, LLC specifically.2 1 2 Referred to by Pom Wonderful, LLC as “Cranberry & Pomegranate product.” See Order on Plaintiff and CounterDefendant’s Motion to Compel Further Response and Production of Documents, Pom Wonderful LLC v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., No. 09-00565- This court hereby orders that: 1. Third Party Arnold Worldwide, LLC’s Motion to Quash, or in the Alternative, to Modify Plaintiff’s Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action [#1] is ALLOWED. Arnold Worldwide, LLC must comply with the subpoena to testify at a deposition and to produce documents by Tuesday, November 8, 2011. The deposition and the production of documents are limited to the following topics: i. Ocean Spray’s Cranberry & Pomegranate Flavored Juice Blended with Three Juices from Concentrate with Added Ingredients.3 ii. Ocean Spray’s work with Arnold targeting and investigating Pom Wonderful, LLC specifically. 2. POM Wonderful, LLC’s Application for Order to Show Cause as to Why Third Party Arnold Worldwide LLC Should Not Be Held in Contempt for Disobedience of Deposition Subpoena and Request for Oral Argument [#7 and #8] is DENIED. 3. Arnold Worldwide LLC’s Motion to Strike POM Wonderful’s Motion for Contempt [#11] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Joseph L. Tauro United States District Judge DDP (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2010), ECF no. 104 (limiting discovery from Ocean Spray to documents that reference Ocean Spray’s Cranberry & Pomegranate Flavored Juice Blended with Three Juices from Concentrate with Added Ingredients). 3 This includes all documents that refer to Ocean Spray’s Cranberry & Pomegranate Flavored Juice Blended with Three Juices from Concentrate with Added Ingredients, even if these documents also refer to other products. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?