Wood, Dr. et al v. Massachusetts Department of Transportation et al

Filing 18

Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered re pro se appearance of plaintiff Green Line Advisory Group of Medford. (Cicolini, Pietro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS _______________________________________ ) DR. WILLIAM WOOD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) 13-CV-10115 ) MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ) ) TRANSPORTATION, et al., ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) ORDER ON PRO SE APPEARANCE OF GREEN LINE ADVISORY GROUP FOR MEDFORD SAYLOR, J. Dr. William Wood, Carolyn Rosen-Wood, and the Green Line Advisory Group for Medford have brought this action against the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, and related parties, alleging that defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 4321-4347. Plaintiffs seek a court order enjoining defendants from proceeding with the Green Line Extension Project that proposes infrastructure modifications to the rail lines in Medford, Massachusetts. No counsel has entered an appearance for plaintiffs. An organizational entity must appear in this Court only by an authorized attorney. See, e.g., Duquette v. Stern, 2011 WL 468783, *1 (D. Mass. 2011); Volumetric Imaging, Inc. v. Teledyne, Inc., 194 F.R.D. 373, 374 (D. Mass. 2000). Because an organizational entity may not proceed pro se, the Court will give plaintiff Green Line Advisory Group for Medford 30 days to obtain counsel. Accordingly, the Green Line Advisory Group for Medford must obtain counsel by March 28, 2013, or its claims will be dismissed. So Ordered. /s/ F. Dennis Saylor IV F. Dennis Saylor IV United States District Judge Dated: February 26, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?