Cloran v. Colvin

Filing 4

Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: PROCEDURAL ORDER entered. Plaintiff must either (1) pay the $400.00filing and administrative fees; or (2) move for leave to proceedwithout prepayment of the filing fee. Failure of plaintiff tocomply with this directive within 21 days of the date of thisProcedural Order may result in the dismissal of this action.(PSSA, 1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/11/2013: # 1 IFP form) (PSSA, 1).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DENISE CLORAN Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 13-11669-DPW PROCEDURAL ORDER Plaintiff has filed a self-prepared complaint, but has not paid the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee1, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) ($350.00 filing fee for all non-habeas civil actions), or filed a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (proceedings in forma pauperis). Accordingly, plaintiff must either (1) pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees; or (2) move for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Failure of plaintiff to comply with this directive within 21 days of the date of this Procedural Order may result in the dismissal of this action. If plaintiff elects to seek in forma pauperis status, plaintiff must submit an affidavit that includes a statement of all plaintiff’s assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). For the convenience of litigants, this Court provides a form application to seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall provide plaintiff with an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. SO ORDERED. /s/ Douglas P. Woodlock DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: July 11, 2013 1 The $50.00 administrative fee became effective May 1, 2013. See Judicial Conference Fee Schedule.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?