Cloran v. Colvin
Filing
4
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: PROCEDURAL ORDER entered. Plaintiff must either (1) pay the $400.00filing and administrative fees; or (2) move for leave to proceedwithout prepayment of the filing fee. Failure of plaintiff tocomply with this directive within 21 days of the date of thisProcedural Order may result in the dismissal of this action.(PSSA, 1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/11/2013: # 1 IFP form) (PSSA, 1).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
DENISE CLORAN
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C.A. No. 13-11669-DPW
PROCEDURAL ORDER
Plaintiff has filed a self-prepared complaint, but has not
paid the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee1,
see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) ($350.00 filing fee for all non-habeas
civil actions), or filed a motion for leave to proceed without
prepayment of the filing fee, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (proceedings
in forma pauperis).
Accordingly, plaintiff must either (1) pay the $400.00
filing and administrative fees; or (2) move for leave to proceed
without prepayment of the filing fee. Failure of plaintiff to
comply with this directive within 21 days of the date of this
Procedural Order may result in the dismissal of this action.
If plaintiff elects to seek in forma pauperis status,
plaintiff must submit an affidavit that includes a statement of
all plaintiff’s assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). For the
convenience of litigants, this Court provides a form application
to seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall
provide plaintiff with an Application to Proceed in District
Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Douglas P. Woodlock
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATE: July 11, 2013
1
The $50.00 administrative fee became effective May 1, 2013.
See Judicial Conference Fee Schedule.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?