Christensen et al v. Apple Inc.

Filing 18

STIPULATION of Dismissal by Adam Christensen, William Farrell, Jeffrey Scolnick. (Siprut, Joseph)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ADAM CHRISTENSEN, JEFFREY SCOLNICK, and WILLIAM FARRELL on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 14-cv-10100 Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs Adam Christensen, Jeffrey Scolnick, and William Farrell and Defendant Apple Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismiss this action with prejudice as to Plaintiffs’ individual claims and without prejudice as to the proposed class claims. Except as otherwise agreed, each party shall bear its own costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees. Dated: June 30, 2014 Respectfully Submitted, SIPRUT PC MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Joseph J. Siprut By: /s/ Purvi G. Patel Joseph J. Siprut* jsiprut@siprut.com David M. Walsh* dwalsh@mofo.com Purvi G. Patel* ppatel@mofo.com Adam M. Sevell* asevell@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 6000 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: 213.892.5200 Fax: 213.892.5454 SIPRUT PC 17 North State Street Suite 1600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Tel: 312.236.0000 Fax: 312.470.6588 Alexander Shapoval ashapoval@siprut.com SIPRUT PC 1 Winnisimmet Street Chelsea, MA 02150 Tel: 617.889.5800 Fax: 617.884.3005 Dustin F. Hecker dhecker@pbl.com Adam L. Littman alittman@pbl.com POSTERNAK BLANKSTEIN & LUND LLP The Prudential Tower 800 Boylston Street, 33rd Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02199 Tel: 671.973.6100 Fax: 617.722.7927 * Admitted pro hac vice * Admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class 4840-1986-7164, v. 1 Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?