Marales v. Colvin
Filing
14
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Accordingly, for Maraless failure to prosecute this action, and for his failure to comply with the Courts Orders of February 25, 2014, and July 24, 2014, the Court hereby DISMISSES this action.(Simeone, Maria)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
____________________________________
)
JUAN MARALES,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
Civil Action No. 14-10224-LTS
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
DISMISSAL ORDER
September 16, 2014
SOROKIN, D.J.
This action challenges a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration. Plaintiff, Juan Marales, who is represented by counsel, filed this Complaint on
January 29, 2014. Doc. No. 1. On February 25, 2014, the Court issued an Order which required
that Marales complete service on the Defendant within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the
date of the Order. Doc. No. 8. Thus, Marales was ordered to serve the Defendant by June 25,
2014. Marales did not comply with that Order. On July 24, 2014, the Court issued an Order
requiring Marales to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute
the action and for failure to comply with the Court’s Order of February 25, 2014. Doc. No. 12.
The July 24, 2014 Order to Show Cause was sent to Marales’s counsel by certified mail
and by e-mail through the Court’s electronic filing system. Doc. No. 12. To date, Marales has
not completed service on the Defendant and he has not responded to the Court’s Order of July
24, 2014.
Accordingly, for Marales’s failure to prosecute this action, and for his failure to comply
with the Court’s Orders of February 25, 2014, and July 24, 2014, the Court hereby DISMISSES
this action.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Leo T. Sorokin
Leo T. Sorokin
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?