Farrier v. Naphcare Inc. et al
Filing
25
Judge Rya W. Zobel: ORDER entered denying 15 Motion to Amend. The Clerk mailed a copy of this order to plaintiff with copies of the summonses that were issued on May 6, 2014 and a copy of amended complaint #12 (the operative complaint). (PSSA, 4)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Civil Action No. 14-10370-RWZ
RONALD W. FARRIER, JR.
v.
NAPHCARE, INC., ET AL.
ORDER
July 8, 2014
ZOBEL, D.J.
Plaintiff Ronald W. Farrier, an inmate at the Suffolk County House of Correction,
initiated this civil rights action on February 18, 2014. By Orders dated May 5, 2014 and
May 28, 2014, the Court allowed plaintiff to amend his complaint. Docket ## 8, 14. The
May 28th Order directed plaintiff to “cease filing amendments to the complaint every five
days.” Docket #14.
Two days later, on May 30, 2014, the Court received plaintiff’s fifth motion to
amend.1 See Docket #15. The motion is substantially similar to plaintiff’s earlier motions.
On June 27, 2014, the Court received a letter from plaintiff seeking, among other things,
summonses to serve defendants Cesar Novoa, Andrea Cabral and Steven Thompkins.
See Docket #21. On June 23, 2014, defendants McIntyre and Naphcare were granted an
extension of time to July 18, 2014 to answer. See Electronic Order, Docket #20.
Under these circumstances, the Court denies plaintiff’s motion to amend. See
Villanueva v. United States, 662 F.3d 124, 127 (1st Cir. 2011) (affirming denial of a motion
to amend to add a new claim and new defendants that was brought four months after the
filing of the complaint where the plaintiff offered no justification for the delay); Kay v. N.W.
1
It is unlikely that plaintiff received a copy of the Court's May 28th Order before
filing the instant motion to amend.
Democratic Party, 821 F.2d 31, 34 (1st Cir. 987) (affirming a finding of undue delay where
almost three months had elapsed). The Clerk shall mail to plaintiff copies of this Order, the
summonses that were issued on May 6, 2014 and a copy of amended complaint #12 (the
operative complaint).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Rya W. Zobel
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?