Pete v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
Filing
3
Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. No filing fee shall be assessed. This order is a final order of dismissal.(PSSA, 3)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
STEVE PETE,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
14-12796-WGY
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
YOUNG, D.J.
June 8, 2015
Steve Pete was a named plaintiff in Stote v. UMass
Correctional Health Care, C.A. No. 13-10267-NMG, a civil rights
action filed by MCI Norfolk inmate John E. Stote in which he and
over one hundred other prisoners claimed that medical care at MCI
Norfolk was inadequate.
In an order dated June 25, 2014, the Court ordered that the
claims of each plaintiff be severed and that a separate case be
opened up for each individual plaintiff.
See id. (D. 20).
The
order directed each plaintiff who wanted to prosecute his own
claims to pay the $400 filing fee or file an Application to
Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs within
sixty days and that the failure to pay the fee or seek leave to
proceed without payment of the fee may result in dismissal of the
individual action without prejudice.
The Clerk mailed a copy of
Judge Gorton’s order and the form Application to Pete in June
2014.
The sixty-day period has expired without any response from
Pete.
The documents the Clerk mailed to him were not returned as
undeliverable.
The Court therefore assumes that the plaintiff
received the documents previously sent to him and has chosen not
to prosecute this action.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
filing fee shall be assessed.
This order is a final order of
dismissal.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ William G. Young
WILLIAM G. YOUNG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
No
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?