Mark D. Elliott v. Clark County Collection Service LLC et al
Filing
10
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered granting 7 Motion to Dismiss (Danieli, Chris)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-13389-GAO
MARK D. ELLIOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
CLARK COUNTY COLLECTION SERVICE, LLC; DAVID L. STEINBERG; and SDMI
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Defendants.
ORDER
February 11, 2015
O’TOOLE, D.J.
The defendants removed this action from the Small Claims Session of the Boston
Municipal Court, East Boston Division, where the plaintiff alleged violations of Massachusetts
General Law Chapter 93A and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.
(“FDCPA”).
The defendants have moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and submit
supporting affidavits that declare the absence of any contacts with Massachusetts. The plaintiff
has not opposed the motion.
A plaintiff has the burden of presenting evidence that “is sufficient to support findings of
all facts essential to personal jurisdiction.” Bluetarp Financial, Inc. v. Matrix Constr. Co., Inc.,
709 F.3d 72, 79 (1st Cir. 2013). A plaintiff must make a prima facie showing that the exercise of
personal jurisdiction over the defendant satisfies both the applicable state’s long-arm statute and
the constitutional due process requirements. U.S.S. Yachts, Inc. v. Ocean Yachts, Inc., 894 F.2d
9, 11 (1st Cir. 1990). In the absence of any opposition to the motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s
complaint is absolutely silent on the defendants’ amenability to suit in this district. In contrast,
the defendants’ submissions aver in detail that defendants Clark County Collection Service,
LLC, David. L. Steinberg, and SDMI Limited Partnership lack the contacts and nexus with
Massachusetts that would allow this Court to maintain personal jurisdiction over them.
The plaintiff has failed to make the prima facie showing. Accordingly, the defendants’
Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 7) is GRANTED.
The action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction over the
defendants.
It is SO ORDERED.
/s/ George A. O’Toole, Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?