Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al
Filing
425
MOTION to Unseal Document by President and Fellows of Harvard College.(Ellsworth, Felicia)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON DIVISION
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD
COLLEGE (HARVARD CORPORATION),
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-14176-ADB
Defendant.
HARVARD’S MOTION TO UNSEAL CERTAIN INFORMATION FILED IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PARTIES’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
1.
In recognition of the important privacy interests at issue in this case, on May 23,
2018, this Court ordered the parties to meet and confer before filing any summary judgment
motions to propose a procedure that would allow the Court to determine which documents filed
under seal in connection with the parties’ summary judgment motions should remain sealed.
Dkt. 404. During the days and weeks following the entry of that order, the parties met and
conferred, narrowing the scope of their disputes regarding confidentiality substantially. On June
12, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion proposing a schedule for briefing the remaining
confidentiality disputes, which the Court entered that same day. Dkt. 408, 409. As contemplated
by that motion, the parties filed a joint motion to seal on June 13, and the Court allowed the
motion on June 14. Dkt. 410, 411.
2.
Pursuant to this Court’s orders, on June 15, 2018, Harvard and SFFA each filed
motions for summary judgment, memoranda of law, statements of material facts, declarations,
and exhibits, the majority of which were filed publicly without redaction. In accordance with
Local Rule 7.2, the Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 55), this Court’s order regarding the
parties’ disputes relating to confidentiality (Dkt. 409), and the parties’ joint motion to seal (Dkt.
411), the parties filed under seal some of the exhibits in support of their motions, and redacted
limited information from other exhibits, declarations, and from their memoranda of law and
statements of material facts. Harvard then immediately undertook a review of the materials
SFFA filed under seal or filed publicly with redactions, and on June 22, 2018, informed SFFA
that many of these materials did not need to be sealed and could be publicly filed.
3.
Harvard also filed a memorandum (Dkt. 422) explaining why the privacy interests
of applicants, alumni, and non-parties—and Harvard’s own interest in protecting its
commercially sensitive information—require a small amount of the redacted or sealed
information to remain under seal. Harvard also informed the Court in that memorandum that it
had identified for SFFA many of the documents previously filed under seal that should be
unsealed. Dkt. 422 at Ex. D. Accordingly, Harvard respectfully requests that the Court unseal
the previously-sealed documents listed below:
Exhibits to the Declaration of Michael
Connolly (Dkt. 421)
5, 11-13, 19, 22-26, 35, 67, 82, 83, 85, 91,
111, 120, 121, 138, 231, 233, 234
Exhibits to the Declaration of Felicia
Ellsworth (Dkt. 419)
3-8, 10, 12-14, 16-18, 20, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29,
30, 54, 55
4.
Harvard has also informed SFFA and the Court that 16 exhibits that SFFA filed
under seal could be publicly filed with limited redactions, and that two exhibits filed by Harvard
under seal can also be publicly filed with limited redactions. Dkt. 422 at Ex. D (Connolly Exs. 1,
2, 6-10, 14, 16-18, 20, 78, 110, 140, 225; Ellsworth Exs. 1, 9). In addition, Harvard has
informed SFFA that SFFA may remove many of the redactions it applied to its summary
2
judgment brief, Rule 56.1 statement, and its expert declarations, and that Harvard intends to
remove certain redactions from its brief and the expert reports Harvard filed as exhibits.
5.
WHEREFORE, Harvard respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and
(1) allow the exhibits listed in the chart above (identified in paragraph 3 of this motion) to be
unsealed and (2) authorize the parties to provide the Court with (A) redacted copies of certain
previously-sealed exhibits (identified in paragraph 4 of this motion) for public filing, and (B)
copies of certain documents previously filed publicly with redactions (identified in paragraph 4
of this motion) that may now be filed with fewer redactions.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Felicia H. Ellsworth
William F. Lee (BBO #291960)
Felicia H. Ellsworth (BBO #665232)
Andrew S. Dulberg (BBO #675405)
Elizabeth C. Mooney (BBO #679522)
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Tel: (617) 526-6000
Fax: (617) 526-5000
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
felicia.ellsworth@wilmerhale.com
andrew.dulberg@wilmerhale.com
elizabeth.mooney@wilmerhale.com
Seth P. Waxman (pro hac vice)
Paul R.Q. Wolfson (pro hac vice)
Daniel Winik (pro hac vice)
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
1875 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: (202) 663-6800
Fax: (202) 663-6363
seth.waxman@wilmerhale.com
paul.wolfson@wilmerhale.com
3
daniel.winik@wilmerhale.com
Debo P. Adegbile (pro hac vice)
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
7 World Trade Center
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
Tel: (212) 295-6717
Fax: (212) 230-8888
debo.adegbile@wilmerhale.com
Dated: June 28, 2018
4
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
In accordance with Local Rule 7.1(a)(2), I hereby certify that Students for Fair
Admissions, Inc.’s counsel was made aware of this motion before it was filed.
/s/ Felicia H. Ellsworth
Felicia H. Ellsworth
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that this document filed through the CM/ECF system will be sent
electronically to all counsel of record via the CM/ECF system.
/s/ Felicia H. Ellsworth
Felicia H. Ellsworth
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?