Robertson, Jr v. U.S Federal Goverment et al

Filing 31

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered in re 17 Motion to Dismiss. (Danieli, Chris)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JAMES M. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 15-10432-LTS ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (DOC. NO. 17) May 17, 2016 SOROKIN, J. Defendant the United States Federal Government (“The United States”) has moved to dismiss this case, asserting that Plaintiff James M. Robertson (“Mr. Robertson”) has not yet—as he must before coming to this Court—exhausted his administrative remedies by filing a request with the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (“Army Board”) to adjust his service records to reflect his correct entry and exit dates. Doc. No. 17. The Court granted Mr. Robertson until April 30, 2016 to supplement his papers before the Court with evidence of a filing with, and decision by, the Army Board. Doc. No. 21. On April 28, 2016, Mr. Robertson submitted an Application for Correction of Military Record which he appears to have filed with the Army Board on April 3, 2016. Doc. No. 30. While evidence of Mr. Robertson’s attempt to exhaust his administrative remedies, this filing does not show that he has exhausted them. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See Navas v. Gonzalez Vales, 752 F.2d 765, 769 (1st Cir. 1985). Nothing in this dismissal prevents Mr. Robertson from continuing to proceed before the Army Board and, if unhappy with the Army Board’s decision, then filing for review of that decision in this Court. The Clerk shall mail this Order to Mr. Robertson. SO ORDERED. /s/ Leo T. Sorokin Leo T. Sorokin United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?