Eshetu v. Propark Inc.

Filing 7

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. The time for responding to the Courts August 24, 2015 Memorandum and Order expired on September 28, 2015. Having received no response to that Memorandum and Order, the above entitled action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter a separate order of dismissal. The clerk mailed a copy of this order to the plaintiff.(PSSA, 4)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
ABRAHA B. ESHETU
Plaintiff,
v.
PROPARK, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C.A. No. 15-11793-LTS

ORDER
SOROKIN, D.J.
Plaintiff Abraha B. Eshetu initiated this action by filing a pro se complaint accompanied
by an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs.
By Memorandum and Order dated August 24, 2015, the Court granted Eshetu’s
Application and advised Eshetu that he must show cause why this action should not be
dismissed, or he shall file an amended complaint.
The time for responding to the Court’s August 24, 2015 Memorandum and Order expired
on September 28, 2015. Having received no response to that Memorandum and Order, the above
entitled action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter a separate order
of dismissal.
SO ORDERED.
October 7, 2015
DATE

/s/ Leo T. Sorokin
LEO T. SOROKIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE