Miller, Jr v. Fund:197

Filing 21

Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL: for the failure to comply with the Court's directives and for the substantive reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order, this action is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. In light of this dismissal, all pending motions (Docket Nos. 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14) are DENIED as moot.(PSSA, 1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ROBERT ETHAN MILLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-12903-NMG FUND: 197, ET AL., CUSIP: 315918672, SYMBOL: FABTX SEARCH VALUE: 197cr49601Iode, or DERIVATIVE, ET AL., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL GORTON, J. On October 19, 2015, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 19) directing plaintiff, a three-strikes litigant, to pay the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee for this action by December 15, 2015, failing which the case would be dismissed. Additionally, this Court dismissed all claims purported to be asserted on behalf of another because plaintiff was not authorized to bring such claims in this Court pro se. Further, this Court reserved ruling on all of plaintiff’s motions (Docket Nos. 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14) pending compliance with this Memorandum and Order. To date, plaintiff has not paid the filing and administrative fees of the Court as directed and the time period for doing so has expired. Accordingly, for the failure to comply with the Court’s directives and for the substantive reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order, this action is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. In light of this dismissal, all pending motions (Docket Nos. 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14) are DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. DATED: December 30, 2015 /s/ Nathaniel M. Gorton Nathaniel M. Gorton United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?