Fromberg v. City Of Marlborough et al

Filing 8

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL: for the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the Court's directives and for the substantive reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 6), this action is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety.(PSSA, 1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
ALEC H. FROMBERG,
Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-14183-LTS

CITY OF MARLBOROUGH,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
SOROKIN, U.S.D.J.
On January 4, 2016, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 6) denying
plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction enjoining criminal proceedings, denying his
Motion for Appointment of Counsel and granting the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma
pauperis. Additionally, this Court dismissed the City of Marlborough as a defendant sua sponte
and directed plaintiff to demonstrate good cause in writing why this action should not be
dismissed for the reasons stated therein, or file an Amended Complaint by February 8, 2016.
To date, plaintiff has not filed either an Amended Complaint or a show cause response as
directed and the time period for doing so has expired.
Accordingly, for the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the Court’s directives and for
the substantive reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 6), this action is
hereby DISMISSED in its entirety.

SO ORDERED.
/s/ Leo T. Sorokin
LEO T. SOROKIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED: March 7, 2016