Bell v. State of Maryland et al
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. The Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [Copy of order mailed to plaintiff at address of record, PO BOX 51891, Boston, MA 02210, on 10/14/2016.] (PSSA, 3)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11743-GAO
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Plaintiff Shawn Bell, appearing pro se brings this action against in which she alleges that
the “State of Maryland” in responsible for numerous injuries she has suffered because of the
misconduct of public employees. The plaintiff claims that the defendant, inter alia, falsely
detained her, stole her property, failed to provide adequate medical care after being severely
injured while detained, and denied her adequate legal representation. Bell, who states that she
resides in Boston, Massachusetts, identifies the State of Maryland as the sole defendant. For the
following reasons, the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), a civil action may be brought in
(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are
residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in
which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim
occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is
situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought
as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject
to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.
28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Bell asserts claims arising from events and proceedings that occurred in
Maryland. Because the defendant does not reside in this District and Shawn does not allege that
a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to her claims arose in this District, venue
is not proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). See, e.g., Aname v. Florida, 169 Fed.
Appx. 524, 528 (10th Cir. 2006) (upholding dismissal of lawsuit for improper venue; plaintiff
had brought suit in the District of New Mexico against the State of Florida and others for civil
rights violations stemming from his arrest, conviction and incarceration in Florida). The
plaintiff’s claims arose in Maryland. Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Maryland, see 28
U.S.C. § 1391(b), and the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland, see 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court
for the District of Maryland. Whether Bell should be permitted to proceed further without
prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not
issue from this Court. This order closes this case.
/s/ George A. O’Toole, Jr.
GEORGE A. O’TOOLE, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?