McGee v. Colvin

Filing 7

Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: ORDER entered. Social Security Procedural Order(Halley, Taylor)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Plaintiff(s) CIVIL ACTION Lynette McGee V. Carolyn W. Colvin NO. 1 6 - c v - 1 1 9 7 9 - G A O Defendant(s) Social Security Procedural Order Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. The following procedures govern all actions challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration filed under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §405, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (1) Time for Filing Answer. Within 60 days after service of the complaint, the Commissioner must serve and file: (A) an answer; and (B) a certified copy of the administrative record, which may be in electronic form. (2) Motion for Order Reversing the Commissioner's Decision. Within 42 days after the Commissioner files an answer, the plaintiff must serve and file: (A) a Motion for Order Reversing the Commissioner's Decision or for other relief; and a supporting memorandum, not to exceed, without leave of the court, 20 pages double spaced. (3) Motion for Order Affirming the Commissioner's Decision. Within 42 days after the plaintiff files the Motion for Order Reversing the Commissioner's Decision, the Commissioner must serve and file: (A) a Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner or for other relief; and a supporting memorandum, not to exceed, without leave of the court, 20 pages double spaced. (4) Reply Memorandum. Within 14 days after the Commissioner files the Motion for Order Affirming the Commissioner's Decision, the plaintiff may serve and file a reply not to exceed 10 pages. (5) Further Reply Memorandum. If the plaintiff raises new issues or arguments in a reply memorandum, the Commissioner may serve and file a sur−reply, not to exceed 10 pages, within 14 days after service of the reply memorandum. By the Court, Dated: 02/01/2017 /s/− Taylor Halley Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?