Hashem v. Stephen
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered denying 78 Motion for Protective Order. SEE attached ORDER. (MacDonald, Gail)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
SABA HASHEM, individually, and as a
member of, and derivatively on behalf of,
D’Angelo and Hashem, LLC,
STEPHEN D’ANGELO, D’ANGELO
LAW GROUP, LLC, and D’ANGELO
AND HASHEM, LLC.
Civil Action No. 16-cv-12383-IT
Presently before this court is Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order [#78]. Defendants
seek a protective order preventing certain disclosures by Santander Bank, N.A. and Enterprise
Bank and Trust in response to Intervenor Plaintiff Jennifer Carrion’s subpoenas duces tecum. As
Defendants have not established that the requested disclosures are covered by attorney-client
privilege, the Motion [#78] is DENIED. However, given the possibility that the requested
disclosures may contain privileged information of D’Angelo and Hashem, LLC’s clients,
Carrion’s counsel shall retain the documents obtained in response to the subpoenas for attorneys’
eyes only. Once counsel reviews the documents, counsel may seek a further court order
regarding use or disclosure of the documents.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: January 11, 2018
/s/ Indira Talwani
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?