Forward Financing LLC v. Mark D. Guidubaldi & Associates, LLC et al

Filing 21

District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered The #18 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (see attached Order) (Montes, Mariliz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS __________________________________________ ) FORWARD FINANCING LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 16-CV-12406-LTS ) GUIDUBALDI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 18) April 11, 2017 SOROKIN, D.J. Plaintiff, a Massachusetts company, alleges Defendants committed tortious interference by “directing” merchants to breach their contracts with Plaintiff. Doc. 1 at 7. Defendants have moved to dismiss, arguing venue is improper because neither of the Defendants and none of the merchants Defendants allegedly “direct[ed]” is in Massachusetts.1 Doc. 18 at 5-6. This argument fails. According to the Complaint, Defendants knew about the merchants’ contracts with Plaintiff and intentionally interfered with those contracts. Doc. 1 at 7. Because Plaintiff is “headquartered in [Massachusetts], this district is one of the places where the tortious interference . . . occurred and where the harms from” Defendants’ alleged torts “were felt.” Astro-Med, Inc. v. Nihon Kohden America, Inc., 591 F.3d 1, 12 (1st Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). Moreover, the Court notes that neither of the two Defendant corporations challenges that it was “subject to personal jurisdiction” in this District at the time this action “commenced”; 1 Defendants also argued this action should yield to a similar lawsuit between the parties in Illinois. See Doc. 18 at 2. However, that lawsuit has been dismissed, see Doc. 20-1, so that argument is moot. 1 thus, Defendants are “deemed to reside” in this District “[f]or purposes of venue.” Id. at 11 n.6 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)) (internal quotation marks omitted). For these reasons, the Court finds venue in this District is “proper” under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2). Id. at 11-12. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Leo T. Sorokin Leo T. Sorokin United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?