US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Dickey et al

Filing 59

Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This interpleader action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court has not addressed the case on the merits. However, based on the parties representations at the hearing, Defendants ind ividual claims to the surplus funds do not exceed $440,893.64. An interpleader action is not appropriate under these circumstances where the claimants are not adverse. See Hudson Sav. Bank v. Austin, 479 F.3d 102, 107 (1st Cir. 2007) ([I]nterple ader is not available unless the defendants claims are adverse to each other. (citation omitted)); see also State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire, 386 U.S. 523, 537 (1967) (noting that federal interpleader was not intended to serve the function of a bill of peace). For this reason, all claims and counterclaims in this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ___________________________________ ) U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ) FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION ) TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action ) No. 17-10009-PBS JAMES S. DICKEY, ENDEAVOR CAPITAL ) FUNDING LLC f/k/a CAPITAL TRUST ) FUNDING LLC, and UNITED STATES OF ) AMERICA, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) ) JAMES S. DICKEY, ) ) Counterclaim ) Plaintiff and ) Third-Party ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ) FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION ) TRUST, ) ) Counterclaim ) Defendant, and ) ) 497 E. 4TH STREET LLC, and ANDREW ) SCHENA, ) Third-Party ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) ORDER OF DISMISSAL November 20, 2017 Saris, C.J. 1   BACKGROUND Plaintiff U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust (“U.S. Bank”), filed this interpleader action (Docket No. 1-3) in Suffolk County Superior Court, pursuant to an order by the Boston Housing Court. U.S. Bank sought to have the state court decide the rights of Defendants James S. Dickey, Endeavor Capital Funding LLC f/k/a Capital Trust Funding LLC (“Endeavor Capital”), and the United States of America with respect to $440,893.64 in surplus funds from a foreclosure sale. On January 4, 2017, Defendant United States of America removed the case to this Court. Dickey then filed a counterclaim against U.S. Bank and a third-party complaint against 497 E. 4th Street LLC and Andrew Schena (Docket No. 23). A hearing on the pending motions was held on November 20, 2017. ORDER This interpleader action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court has not addressed the case on the merits. However, based on the parties’ representations at the hearing, Defendants’ individual claims to the surplus funds do not exceed $440,893.64. An interpleader action is not appropriate under these circumstances where the claimants are not adverse. See Hudson Sav. Bank v. Austin, 479 F.3d 102, 107 (1st Cir. 2007) (“[I]nterpleader is not available unless the defendants’ claims are ‘adverse’ to each other.” (citation omitted)); see also 2   State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Tashire, 386 U.S. 523, 537 (1967) (noting that “federal interpleader was not intended to serve the function of a ‘bill of peace’”). For this reason, all claims and counterclaims in this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. /s/ PATTI B. SARIS ____ Patti B. Saris Chief United States District Judge 3  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?