Coutu v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al

Filing 37

Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER On Certificate of Appealability entered. re 36 Order on Motion to Dismiss (Halley, Taylor)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS _______________________________________ ) DAVID DANIEL COUTU, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF ) MASSACHUSETTS and ) ATTORNEY GENERAL MAURA ) HEALEY, ) ) Respondents. ) _______________________________________) Civil Action No. 17-10702-FDS ORDER ON CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SAYLOR, J. This is a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Petitioner was convicted by a jury in 2007 of aggravated rape, home invasion, and mayhem, among other things. The Court has dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He can only appeal that dismissal if he receives a certificate of appealability. For the following reasons, the Court will not certify the appealability of this dismissal. A certificate of appealability will issue only if the petitioner “has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). That standard is satisfied by “demonstrating that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of [petitioner’s] constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). That standard must be independently satisfied as to “each and every issue raised by a habeas petitioner.” See Bui v. DiPaolo, 170 F.3d 232, 236 (1st Cir. 1999). The Court concludes that jurists of reason could not disagree that petitioner has failed to exhaust at least one of his claims. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. So Ordered. Dated: May 29, 2018 /s/ F. Dennis Saylor F. Dennis Saylor, IV United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?