Hanson v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 24

Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered granting 18 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs remaining claims against Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lyft, Inc., are DISMISSED for the reasons stated in, and for failure to comply with, the August 16, 2017 Memorandum and Order. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety and the Clerk shall enter a separate order of dismissal. (PSSA, 4)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS TIMOTHY HANSON, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Civil Action No. 17-10862-ADB BURROUGHS, D.J. On August 16, 2017, Plaintiff was granted until August 31, 2017 to demonstrate good cause why this case should not be dismissed and file any opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. Plaintiff was advised that failure to do so may result in immediate dismissal of this case. Plaintiff has failed to file a response and the time period for doing so has expired. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 22) and for the failure of Plaintiff to comply with the directives contained therein, it is hereby ORDERED that 1. Apple’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lyft, Inc., are DISMISSED for the reasons stated in, and for failure to comply with, the August 16, 2017 Memorandum and Order. 3. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety and the Clerk shall enter a separate order of dismissal. SO ORDERED. /s/ Allison D. Burroughs Allison D. Burroughs United States District Judge Dated: September 1, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?