Duane v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company
Filing
77
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered overruling Duane's Objection. (Zierk, Marsha)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-11982-RGS
JON DUANE
v.
VERMONT MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION
TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S DENIAL OF A MOTION
TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
December 7, 2018
STEARNS, D.J.
Because Magistrate Judge Boal’s determination that plaintiff Jon
Duane has failed to show good cause for a late attempt to amend his
Complaint is unassailable, his objection to her Order is overruled. When
considerable time has elapsed between the filing of a complaint and the filing
of a motion to amend, the movant at the very least has the burden of showing
some valid reason for his neglect and delay. In re Lombardo, 755 F.3d 1, 3
(1st Cir. 2014); see also Steir v. Girl Scouts of the USA, 383 F.3d 7, 12 (1st
Cir. 2004) (“Regardless of the context, the longer a plaintiff delays, the more
likely the motion to amend will be denied, as protracted delay, with its
attendant burdens on the opponent and the court, is itself a sufficient reason
for the court to withhold permission to amend.
ORDER
For the foregoing reasons, Duane’s objection is OVERRULED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Richard G. Stearns
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?