Duane v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 77

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered overruling Duane's Objection. (Zierk, Marsha)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-11982-RGS JON DUANE v. VERMONT MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S DENIAL OF A MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT December 7, 2018 STEARNS, D.J. Because Magistrate Judge Boal’s determination that plaintiff Jon Duane has failed to show good cause for a late attempt to amend his Complaint is unassailable, his objection to her Order is overruled. When considerable time has elapsed between the filing of a complaint and the filing of a motion to amend, the movant at the very least has the burden of showing some valid reason for his neglect and delay. In re Lombardo, 755 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2014); see also Steir v. Girl Scouts of the USA, 383 F.3d 7, 12 (1st Cir. 2004) (“Regardless of the context, the longer a plaintiff delays, the more likely the motion to amend will be denied, as protracted delay, with its attendant burdens on the opponent and the court, is itself a sufficient reason for the court to withhold permission to amend. ORDER For the foregoing reasons, Duane’s objection is OVERRULED. SO ORDERED. /s/ Richard G. Stearns UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?