Brandon v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC

Filing 20

Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered granting 15 Motion for Order Plaintiffs are ORDERED to show cause in writing on or before August 16, 2018, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with discovery obligations.(FDS, law1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS _________________________________________ ) HOLLY BRANDON, individually and on ) behalf of J.V., her minor child, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Civil Action No. 17-12354-FDS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE SAYLOR, J. On May 26, 2016, this Court issued MDL Order No. 11, which required each plaintiff to complete a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. (Docket No. 252 ¶ 14). That Order also required plaintiffs to include signed declarations and duly executed authorizations with their fact sheets. (Id.). Furthermore, the Court ordered that “questions on the fact sheets shall be treated as interrogatories under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall be subject to the rules applicable to such interrogatories . . . .” (Id. ¶ 17). It appears that plaintiffs have failed to comply with MDL Order No. 11. The Plaintiff Fact Sheet was due on January 29, 2018, more than six months ago. On June 4, 2018, counsel for GSK sent a letter to plaintiffs’ counsel requesting the document by June 11, 2018, and inviting a meet and confer on the issue. However, the document was never provided. Therefore, GSK’s motion to show cause is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to show cause in writing on or before August 16, 2018, why this case should not be dismissed for 1 failure to comply with discovery obligations. If good cause is not shown by that date, this action will be dismissed pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(A)(v). GSK has also requested that plaintiffs pay a sanction of $500 to cover costs incurred in bringing this motion. In general, an award of attorneys’ fees is appropriate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5) when parties have failed to provide required discovery. Because plaintiffs have offered no reason for their failure to timely provide discovery, to the extent plaintiffs submit the required documents, they are ORDERED to pay GSK $500 in reasonable expenses incurred in bringing this motion. So Ordered. /s/ F. Dennis Saylor F. Dennis Saylor IV United States District Judge Dated: July 26, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?