Mylan Inc. et al v. Analysis Group, Inc.
Filing
5
Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered Transferring Motion to Compel (Halley, Taylor)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
MYLAN, INC., et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
ANALYSIS GROUP, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________________)
Civil Action No.
18-mc-91153-FDS
ORDER TRANSFERRING MOTION TO COMPEL
SAYLOR, J.
District courts may transfer subpoena-related motions to the district that issued the
subpoena when “the person subject to the subpoena consents” or where there are “exceptional
circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f). In this matter, there is an underlying multi-district
litigation proceeding ongoing in the District of Kansas. See In re EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection,
USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation, No. 17-2785-DDC-TJJ. In addition,
the District of Kansas already has before it more than ten outstanding motions to compel in that
MDL matter raising similar types of issues. In light of the complexity of the underlying case, the
risk of inconsistent orders if this Court was to rule on plaintiff’s motion to compel, and the
interests of judicial economy, the Court finds that there are exceptional circumstances warranting
the transfer of the motion to compel. See In re Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litig., 2017
WL 3704822, at *4 (D.D.C. May 18, 2017).
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to transfer the motion to compel is GRANTED, and the
motion to compel is TRANSFERRED to the District of Kansas.
So Ordered.
/s/ F. Dennis Saylor
F. Dennis Saylor IV
United States District Judge
Dated: April 20, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?