Gyukeri v. Department of Revenue
Filing
5
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order, and for the failure of Gyukeri to comply with the directives contained therein, it is hereby Ordered that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.(PSSA, 4)
Case 1:21-cv-11663-LTS Document 5 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
RICHARD GYUKERI,
Plaintiff,
v.
IRS (Department of Revenue,
Defendant.
Civil No. 21-11663-LTS
ORDER
November 18, 2021
SOROKIN, J.
On October 12, 2021, Richard Gyukeri commenced this action with the filing of a pro se
complaint and an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs
(“Application”). Dkt. Nos. 1, 2.
Gyukeri’s Application was denied without prejudice on October 13, 2021. Dkt. No. 4.
Gyukeri was advised that if he chooses to proceed with this action, within 21 days he must: (1)
file a renewed Application; and (2) show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed or
file an amended complaint. Id.
To date, Gyukeri has failed to file a response and the time period for doing so expired on
November 3, 2021.
"A district court, as part of its inherent power to manage its own docket, may dismiss a
case sua sponte for any of the reasons prescribed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)." Cintrn-Lorenzo v.
Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor, 312 F.3d 522, 525-26 (1st Cir. 2002). "Lack of
diligent prosecution is such a reason." Id.
Case 1:21-cv-11663-LTS Document 5 Filed 11/18/21 Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order, and for the failure
of Gyukeri to comply with the directives contained therein, it is hereby Ordered that the abovecaptioned matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Leo T. Sorokin
Leo T. Sorokin
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?