Crowther v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al

Filing 93

Judge Michael A Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: Plaintiffs request for reconsideration is hereby DENIED. The claim related to aggravation of degenerative arthritis in Plaintiffs neck was never included in Plaintiffs original complaint filed in Pennsylvania. The courts rationale for allowing summary judgment on this claim is still valid, and there is no reason to re-think the issue. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)

Crowther v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al

Doc. 93

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GEOFFREY CROWTHER, Plaintiff v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. NO. 09-cv-10334-MAP

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION (Dkt. No. 81) November 30, 2010 PONSOR, U.S.D.J. In its opposition to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 81), Plaintiff requested the court to reconsider its allowance of summary judgment with regard to his claim for aggravation of degenerative arthritis in his neck. A separate motion for reconsideration to this

effect was not filed by Plaintiff, but in order to be sure the issue was adequately addressed, the court ordered Defendant to file its response. Thus, Plaintiff's request

for reconsideration is not contained in an independent motion and therefore does not appear on the docket separately. Plaintiff's request for reconsideration is hereby DENIED. The claim related to aggravation of degenerative

Dockets.Justia.com

arthritis in Plaintiff's neck was never included in Plaintiff's original complaint filed in Pennsylvania. court's rationale for allowing summary judgment on this claim is still valid, and there is no reason to re-think the issue. It is So Ordered. The

/s/ Michael A. Ponsor MICHAEL A. PONSOR U. S. District Judge

-2-