Minahan v. Town of East Longmeadow, Et al

Filing 80

Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: Having reviewed the substance of Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessys Report and Recommendation dated April 22, 2014 and finding it meritorious, and noting that there is no objection, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 79 ). Based upon this, Defendants Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 73 ) is hereby DENIED. It is So Ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
ROSALIND MINAHAN,
Plaintiff
v.
TOWN OF EAST LONGMEADOW,
ET AL.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C.A. NO. 12-cv-30203-MAP

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
(Dkt. Nos. 73 & 79)
May 15, 2014
PONSOR, U.S.D.J.
Having reviewed the substance of Magistrate Judge David
H. Hennessy’s Report and Recommendation dated April 22, 2014
and finding it meritorious, and noting that there is no
objection, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the
Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 79).

Based upon this,

Defendants’ Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 73) is hereby DENIED.
It is So Ordered.
/s/ Michael A. Ponsor
MICHAEL A. PONSOR
U. S. District Judge