Kashif v. United States of America
Filing
27
Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated the court, upon de novo review,hereby ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 25 ) Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 21 ) is ALLOWED. It is So Ordered. See toe attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
IRFAN KASHIF,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Civil Action No. 14-30180-MGM
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Dkt. Nos. 21 and 25)
July 14, 2016
MASTROIANNI, U.S.D.J.
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended that the court allow
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 21.) In a Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”), Judge Robertson concluded Plaintiff failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact
regarding FNS’s determination that a violation occurred or Plaintiff’s eligibility for a discretionary
civil monetary penalty in lieu of otherwise mandatory permanent disqualification. (Dkt. No. 25.)
Accordingly, Judge Robertson concluded Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The
R&R notified Plaintiff that, if he had an objection, it would have to be filed within fourteen days.
No objection has been filed. Based upon the thorough analysis presented in the R&R, and noting
there are no objections, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the R&R. (Dkt. No. 25.)
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 21) is ALLOWED.
It is So Ordered.
_/s/ Mark G. Mastroianni________
MARK G. MASTROIANNI
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?