Bostick v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
Filing
46
Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 45 .) Based upon this, Defendants motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 39 ) is hereby GRANTED. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
TERRELL BOSTICK,
Plaintiff,
v.
SMITH & WESSON CORP.,
Defendant.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Civil Action No. 15-30193-MGM
*
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Dkt. Nos. 39 and 45)
May 16, 2017
MASTROIANNI, U.S.D.J.
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court grant the motion for
summary judgment filed by Defendant, Smith & Wesson Corp. in this action filed by Plaintiff,
Terrell Bostick. (Dkt. No. 39.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment and did not file an opposition to Judge Robertson’s Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) within the fourteen day period set forth on the final page of the R&R.
Based upon the thorough analysis presented in the R&R, and noting there are no objections,
the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 45.)
Based upon this, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 39) is hereby GRANTED.
It is So Ordered.
_/s/ Mark G. Mastroianni________
MARK G. MASTROIANNI
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?