S. et al v. Lorilee I, LLC et al

Filing 82

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. (Dkt. No. 79 .) As a result, Plaintiffs, HAP Community Housing Services, Inc.s, and Gandara Mental Health Center, Inc.s 26 , 38 ,and 60 motions are GRANTED and Defendants third-party complaint is hereby DISMISSED. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS G.S., Plaintiff, v. LORILEE I, LLC, et al., Defendants, v. HAP COMMUNITY HOUSING SERVICES INC., et al. Third-Party Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Civil Action No. 15-30203-MGM MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE, THRID PARTY DEFENDANT HAP COMMUNITY HOUSING SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION TO STRIKE, AND THRID PARTY DEFENDANT GANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT (Dkt. Nos. 26, 38, 60, and 79) December 2, 2016 MASTROIANNI, U.S.D.J. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Defendants’ third-party complaint is improper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 14(a). Judge Robertson therefore recommends that the motions to strike filed by Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 26) and third-party Defendant HAP Community Housing Services, Inc. (Dkt. No. 38) and the motion to dismiss filed by third-party Defendant Gandara Mental Health Center, Inc. (Dkt. No. 60) be granted and Defendant’s third-party complaint (Dkt. No. 23) be dismissed. As Judge Robertson explained, impleader under Rule 14(a) is not appropriate unless the third-party’s liability is dependent on the outcome of the main claim and, here, there is no dependent relationship between the outcome of Plaintiff’s discrimination claims and Defendants’ third-party claims. The Report and Recommendation notified Defendants that they had fourteen days to file an objection. No objection has been filed. Based upon the comprehensive and well-reasoned analysis presented in the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no objections, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. (Dkt. No. 79.) As a result, Plaintiff’s, HAP Community Housing Services, Inc.’s, and Gandara Mental Health Center, Inc.’s motions are GRANTED and Defendant’s third-party complaint is hereby DISMISSED. It is So Ordered. _/s/ Mark G. Mastroianni________ MARK G. MASTROIANNI United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?