Vanegas v. Internal Revenue Service
Filing
7
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. The Clerk shall docket the papers filed on June 4, 2018 6 as an amended complaint and exhibits thereto. The United States of America will be substituted as the sole defendant, The Clerk sh all issue a summons and Plaintiff shall serve the summons, amended complaint, and this order upon the Defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1. Plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of the issuance of the summons to complete service. Failure to complete service in a timely fashion may result in dismissal of the action. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may elect to have the United States Marshals Service complete service with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. [Copy of Order mailed to plaintiff on 6/14/2018.](PSSA, 3)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
DIEGO VANEGAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 18-30065-MGM
ORDER
ROBERTSON, U.S.M.J.
In this action, pro se litigant Diego Vanegas (“Plaintiff”) seeks reimbursement from the
United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) of monies that the IRS withheld from Plaintiff’s
tax refund. According to Plaintiff, the IRS claims that Plaintiff is not entitled to the funds
because his daughter did not live with him in 2014.
In a memorandum and order dated April 4, 2018, the Court allowed Plaintiff’s motion for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court also explained that it does not have jurisdiction
over this lawsuit unless Plaintiff has already filed a timely claim with the IRS. Because Plaintiff
had not indicated whether or not he had filed such a claim, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an
amended complaint.
On June 4, 2018, Plaintiff filed documents (Docket Entry #6), which were docketed as
exhibits to the original complaint. The first page of these documents appears to be an amended
complaint (although not titled as such), and Plaintiff alleges therein that he pursued
administrative relief with the IRS.
Accordingly:
1.
The Clerk shall docket the papers filed on June 4, 2018 (Docket Entry #6) as an
amended complaint and exhibits thereto (collectively, “amended complaint”). The amended
complaint shall be the operative pleading.
2.
Because the United States, rather than the IRS, is the proper defendant, see 26
U.S.C. § 7422(f)(1), the United States of America will be substituted as the sole defendant, and
the IRS shall be terminated as a defendant. The Clerk shall correct the docket accordingly.
3.
The Clerk shall issue a summons and Plaintiff shall serve the summons, amended
complaint, and this order upon the Defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1. 1 Plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of the issuance
of the summons to complete service. Failure to complete service in a timely fashion may result
in dismissal of the action.
4.
Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may elect to have the
United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) complete service with all costs of service to be
advanced by the United States. If so asked by Plaintiff, the USMS shall serve a copy of the
summons, amended complaint, and this order upon the defendant as directed by Plaintiff.
Plaintiff is responsible for providing the USMS all copies for service and for completing a USM285 form for each party to be served. The Clerk shall provide Plaintiff with forms and
instructions for service by the USMS.
/s/ Katherine A. Robertson
KATHERINE A. ROBERTSON
United States Magistrate Judge
DATED: June 14, 2018
1
Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a summons will be issued as to the
United States, and the plaintiff must serve the summons and complaint upon on the United States
Attorney General, the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, and the Internal
Revenue Service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?