McCrohan v. Uxbridge Police Association et al

Filing 234

District Judge Timothy S Hillman: ORDER entered denying 193 Motion to deem service of the writ of execution effective and granting in part and denying in part 226 Motion to Compel. (Castles, Martin)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
_______________________________________
)
)
TARA MCCROHAN,
)
CIVIL ACTION
)
Plaintiff,
)
NO. 11-CV-40232-TSH
)
v.
)
)
UXBRIDGE POLICE ASSOCIATION
)
LOCAL #123, MCOP, AFL-CIO,
)
)
Defendant.
______________________________________ )

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Docket No. 226) AND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DEEM SERVICE OF WRIT OF EXECUTION
EFFECTIVE (Docket No. 193)
April 26, 2016
Plaintiff’s motion to compel (Docket No. 226) is granted in part and denied in part, as
follows:
Request No. 10: the motion is granted as to documents related to a request for legal services
from the Uxbridge Police Association Local #123, MCOP, AFL-CIO only (no other
locals).
Request Nos. 11, 18, & 19: the motion is granted, except as to any correspondence between
attorneys of Sandulli Grace and the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (MCOP).
Documents between Sandulli Grace and MCOP shall be produced to the court within
fourteen (14) days for in camera review.
Requests No. 15, 16, & 17: the motion is granted.
Request Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 22, & 23: the motion is denied without prejudice to renew after
evaluation of the compelled discovery.
1 

Counsel for MCOP is ordered to determine whether MCOP or any of its agents, attorneys,
employees, or assigns, or anyone acting on their behalf, has destroyed, deleted, disposed of, or
otherwise made unavailable any document responsive to any post-judgment discovery request
from the Plaintiff, and to report the results to the court, in writing and in camera.
All parties are ordered to meet and confer and propose a schedule for the resolution of any
continuing issues in these post-judgment proceedings. The schedule shall include any further
discovery, motion practice, and hearings.
Plaintiff’s motion to deem service of the writ of execution effective (Docket No. 193) is
denied without prejudice to be renewed at a later time.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Timothy S. Hillman
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN
DISTRICT JUDGE

2