Watson et al v. Perez et al

Filing 22

District Judge Timothy S Hillman: ORDER entered denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Dismiss and denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Stay. (Castles, Martin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS _______________________________________ ) ) KARIM WATSON AND KIMBERLY ) CIVIL ACTION ESPINO, ) ) NO. 4:15-CV-40014-TSH Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) LUIS PEREZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL ) CAPACITY AS COURT OFFICER FOR THE MASSACHUSETTS TRIAL COURT ) ) AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., ) ) ) Defendants. ______________________________________ ) ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT AND FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDING (Docket No. 14) October 1, 2015 HILLMAN, D.J. Two motions are pending before this Court. Defendants Luis Perez, Sherri Glenn, Stephen Donovan, Daniel DiStefano, David Deignan, Timothy O’Leary, and Katherine Mercadante, in their capacity as Court Officers for the Trial Court of Massachusetts and Individually, respectively, and Robin Yancey, in her capacity as Regional Director of Security for the Trial Court of Massachusetts and Individually, and Daniel Bennett, in his capacity as First Assistant District Attorney for the Worcester County District Attorney’s Office and Individually, move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These same Defendants have also moved to stay any remaining claims following this Court’s action on the motion to dismiss, until the termination of criminal charges brought against Plaintiffs by the Commonwealth. 1 The above-mentioned Defendants’ motions (Docket No. 14) to dismiss and stay the proceeding are hereby denied without prejudice to be reasserted after review of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. SO ORDERED. /s/ Timothy S. Hillman TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?