Walker v. Vlasic Foods Inc

Filing 27

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 26 Request filed by Bruce K. Walker, 25 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Bruce K. Walker Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRUCE K. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 93-10216 VLASIC FOODS, INC., Defendant. / ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS On December 14, 1993, the court granted in part and denied in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss this employment-discrimination action, and the case was subsequently remanded to the Saginaw County Circuit Court. Now, more than eighteen years later, Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a onepage, hand-written paper docketed as a “Request to Add Party.” The latter reads, in its entirety: “I want Local 87 to be part of this case. They failed to represent me. RWDSU Local 87, 2329 N. Mich., Saginaw, Mich., 48602.” The court notes that, in light of the remand order, it no longer has jurisdiction over this dispute. Morever, even if the court did have the power and inclination to reopen this long-closed case, Plaintiff would not require permission to proceed in forma pauperis, as the filing fee was already paid at the outset of the litigation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. # 25] is DENIED AS MOOT. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 5, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, July 9, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 C:\Documents and Settings\wagner\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\93-10216.WALKER.DenyIFPApplication.set.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?