Jones v. Jensen
Filing
9
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation, Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and Dismissing Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (JCre)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION SHERILYN JONES, Plaintiff, Case Number 09-10235-BC Honorable Thomas L. Ludington v. CHRISTINE JENSEN, Defendant. _______________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION This matter is before the Court on a report and recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder on March 27, 2009. The magistrate judge recommends granting Defendant's motion to dismiss because the Court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims, which are moot. As of today's date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Dkt # 8] is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 6] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge Dated: April 21, 2009
PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on April 21, 2009. s/Tracy A. Jacobs TRACY A. JACOBS
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?