Courtney v. Scutt

Filing 22

ORDER denying 21 Motion for Bond. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION BRIAN KEITH COURTNEY, SR., #444293, Petitioner, Civil No. 09-10842-BC Honorable Thomas L. Ludington v. DEBRA L. SCUTT, Respondent. _______________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RELEASE ON BOND Petitioner Brian Keith Courtney, Sr., a Michigan prisoner, seeks the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his plea-based convictions for conducting a criminal enterprise, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.159i(1), and obstruction of justice, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.505. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for release on bond pending the resolution of his habeas petition. In support of his request, Petitioner states that his case has been pending for a lengthy period, he is neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community, and his habeas claims have merit. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has stated that to receive bond pending a decision in a federal habeas case, prisoners must be able to show not only a substantial claim of law based on the facts surrounding the petition but also the existence of ‘some circumstance making [the motion for bail] exceptional and deserving of special treatment in the interests of justice.’ Aronson v. May, 85 S. Ct. 3, 5; 13 L. Ed. 2d 6, 9 (1964) [additional citations omitted]. There will be few occasions where a prisoner will meet this standard. Lee v. Jabe, 989 F.2d 869, 871 (6th Cir. 1993) (quoting Dotson v. Clark, 900 F.2d 77, 79 (6th Cir. 1990)). Federal district courts may grant bail when granting the writ. Sizemore v. District Ct., 735 F.2d 204, 208 (6th Cir. 1984). However, to grant bond prior to making a determination on the merits is extraordinary. See Moore v. Egeler, 390 F. Supp. 205, 207 (E.D. Mich. 1975) (Feikens, J.). Having considered the matter, the Court is not persuaded that the interests of justice require that Petitioner be released on bond pending the resolution of this case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for release on bond [Dkt. # 21] is DENIED. s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge Dated: May 3, 2011 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and upon Brian Courtney, #444293 at Lakeland Correctional Facility, 141 First Street, Coldwater, MI 49036 by first class U.S. mail on May 3, 2011. s/Tracy A. Jacobs TRACY A. JACOBS -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?