Bridges v. Lafler

Filing 28

ORDER denying 27 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ARTHUR BRIDGES, Petitioner, Case Number: 1:09-cv-11665 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington v. BLAINE LAFLER, Respondent. / ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Habeas petitioner Arthur Bridges challenges his convictions for one count of conspiracy to deliver cocaine, Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.741(2)(a)(iv), and one count of possession with intent to deliver cocaine, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.157a. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Bridges has filed a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Bridges has not suggested any particular reason for seeking counsel, and he has no absolute right to be represented on federal habeas corpus review. See Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 65 F.3d 489, 492 (6th Cir. 1995); see also Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 293 (1992) (citing Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)). “[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.” Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (internal quotation omitted). A habeas petitioner may obtain representation at any stage of the case “[w]henever the United States magistrate or the court determines that the interests of justice so require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). The Court determines that the interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel here. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Bridges’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel, ECF No. 27, is DENIED. Dated: December 16, 2013 s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail, and upon Arthur Bridges # 154318, 10274 Boyer Rd, Carson City, MI 48811 by first class U.S. mail on December 16, 2013. s/Tracy A. Jacobs TRACY A. JACOBS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?