United States of America v. Buccilli
Filing
8
ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendation and Granting Govwernment's Petition to Enforce IRS Summons. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Case Number 11-50081-BC
Honorable Thomas L. Ludington
v.
ALEXANDER J. BUCCILLI,
Defendant.
______________________________________ /
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,
AND GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S PETITION TO ENFORCE IRS SUMMONS
Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder issued a report and recommendation [Dkt. # 7] on April
8, 2011, recommending that the Court grant the government’s petition to enforce an IRS summons
against Defendant Alexander J. Buccilli. Any party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin
fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report
. . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district
court is not obligated to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52
(1985).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Judge Binder’s report and recommendation [Dkt. #
7] is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED the government’s petition to enforce the IRS summons [Dkt. # 1]
is GRANTED. If Defendant does not comply with the summons, he will be held in contempt of
Court and an arrest warrant may be issued.
s/Thomas L. Ludington
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON
United States District Judge
Dated: June 6, 2011
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served
upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and upon
Alexander J. Buccilli, 2318 N. Bringhold Avenue, Harrison, MI 48625 by
first class U.S. mail on June 6, 2011.
s/Tracy A. Jacobs
TRACY A. JACOBS
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?