United States of America v. Buccilli

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendation and Granting Govwernment's Petition to Enforce IRS Summons. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case Number 11-50081-BC Honorable Thomas L. Ludington v. ALEXANDER J. BUCCILLI, Defendant. ______________________________________ / ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S PETITION TO ENFORCE IRS SUMMONS Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder issued a report and recommendation [Dkt. # 7] on April 8, 2011, recommending that the Court grant the government’s petition to enforce an IRS summons against Defendant Alexander J. Buccilli. Any party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Judge Binder’s report and recommendation [Dkt. # 7] is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED the government’s petition to enforce the IRS summons [Dkt. # 1] is GRANTED. If Defendant does not comply with the summons, he will be held in contempt of Court and an arrest warrant may be issued. s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge Dated: June 6, 2011 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and upon Alexander J. Buccilli, 2318 N. Bringhold Avenue, Harrison, MI 48625 by first class U.S. mail on June 6, 2011. s/Tracy A. Jacobs TRACY A. JACOBS -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?