Williams v. Bauman

Filing 24

ORDER Denying 16 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Sandusky, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ANTHONY WILLIAMS, #507451, Petitioner, v. Case No. 12-cv-14285 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Respondent. __________________________________________/ ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Petitioner Anthony Williams, a state prisoner, filed a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on September 26, 2012. On December 22, 2014, this Court issued an Opinion & Order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment, denying the petition, and denying a certificate of appealability. ECF No. 14. On January 20, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 16. A motion for reconsideration will be granted if the moving party shows: “(1) a palpable defect, (2) the defect misled the court and the parties, and (3) that correct the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.” Michigan Dept. of Treasury v. Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d 731, 733-34 (E.D. Mich. 2002) (quoting E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3)). A “palpable defect” is “obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain.” Id. at 734 (citing Marketing Displays, Inc. v. Traffix Devices, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 2d 262, 278 (E.D. Mich. 1997). Williams’ petition was denied because he did not comply with the one-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d). Williams’ motion for reconsideration does not address the timeliness of his petition. Instead, it raises further arguments regarding the merits of his substantive claims. It is non-responsive to the grounds for dismissal and will be denied. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Williams’ Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 16, is DENIED. Dated: August 24, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 24, 2015. s/Karri Sandusky Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?