Williams v. Bauman
Filing
24
ORDER Denying 16 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (Sandusky, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
NORTHERN DIVISION
ANTHONY WILLIAMS, #507451,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 12-cv-14285
Honorable Thomas L. Ludington
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN,
Respondent.
__________________________________________/
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Petitioner Anthony Williams, a state prisoner, filed a petition for habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254 on September 26, 2012. On December 22, 2014, this Court issued an Opinion
& Order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment, denying the petition, and
denying a certificate of appealability. ECF No. 14. On January 20, 2015, Petitioner filed a
motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 16.
A motion for reconsideration will be granted if the moving party shows: “(1) a palpable
defect, (2) the defect misled the court and the parties, and (3) that correct the defect will result in
a different disposition of the case.” Michigan Dept. of Treasury v. Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d
731, 733-34 (E.D. Mich. 2002) (quoting E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3)). A “palpable defect” is
“obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain.” Id. at 734 (citing Marketing Displays, Inc. v.
Traffix Devices, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 2d 262, 278 (E.D. Mich. 1997).
Williams’ petition was denied because he did not comply with the one-year statute of
limitations under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d). Williams’ motion for reconsideration does not address the
timeliness of his petition. Instead, it raises further arguments regarding the merits of his
substantive claims. It is non-responsive to the grounds for dismissal and will be denied.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner Williams’ Motion for Reconsideration,
ECF No. 16, is DENIED.
Dated: August 24, 2015
s/Thomas L. Ludington
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON
United States District Judge
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served
upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first
class U.S. mail on August 24, 2015.
s/Karri Sandusky
Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?