Merritt v. LexisNexis Screening Solutions Inc.
ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendation andgranting 5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SCOTT ALBERT MERRITT,
Case Number 13-cv-10768
Honorable Thomas L. Ludington
LEXISNEXIS SCREENING SOLUTIONS INC.,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff Scott Merritt filed suit against Defendant LexisNexis Screening Solutions, Inc.,
in state court. Defendant removed the case to this court and moved to dismiss. The matter was
referred to Judge Binder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On June 6, 2013, Judge Binder issued a report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) on
Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Judge Binder recommends that the motion be granted and the
case be dismissed. Any party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after
being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The
district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which
objection is made.” Id. The Court is not obligated to review the portions of the report to which
no objection was made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985). As of today’s date, no
party has filed any objections to Judge Binder’s report and recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Binder’s report and recommendation (ECF No.
7) is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED.
Dated: June 26, 2013
s/Thomas L. Ludington
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON
United States District Judge
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served
upon each attorney of record herein by electronic means and upon Scott
A. Merritt, 2014 N. Saginaw Road #305, Midland, MI 48640-6614 by
first class U.S. mail on June 26, 2013.
s/Tracy A. Jacobs
TRACY A. JACOBS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?