Borland v. COLVIN

Filing 24

ORDER Adopting 23 Report and Recommendation, Denying Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting Defendant's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment, Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner, and Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION JILLIAN BORLAND, Plaintiff, v Case No. 16-11392 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. __________________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER, AND DISMISSING CASE On April 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed the instant suit seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s unfavorable decision disallowing benefits. ECF No. 1. The Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis for all pretrial purposes. ECF No. 4. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 15, 19. On August 18, 2017, Judge Davis issued a report recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. ECF No. 23. Specifically, Judge Davis found that the ALJ’s assessment of Plaintiff’s credibility was supported by substantial evidence, the ALJ’s residual functional capacity assessment was supported by substantial evidence, and the ALJ adequately analyzed the opinion of Plaintiff’s treating physician, Dr. Sandeep Sood. Rep. & Rec. at 14–22, ECF No. 23. Although the magistrate judge’s report explicitly states that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither party has filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 23, is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 15, is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 19, is GRANTED It is further ORDERED that the findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge Dated: September 13, 2017 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on September 13, 2017. s/Kelly Winslow KELLY WINSLOW, Case Manager -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?