Hailes v. LaVigne

Filing 46

ORDER Adopting 45 Report and Recommendation for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 43 MOTION for enlargment upon bail pending resolution of his habeas corpus petition filed by Earnell Hailes, Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (DEld)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EARNELL HAILES, Petitioner, v. FABIAN LAVIGNE, Respondent. / ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Donald A. Scheer's Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 45, filed March 24, 2009]. Neither party has filed an objection and the time to do so has expired. For the reasons set forth below, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Scheer's Report and Recommendation. Magistrate Judge Sheer concluded that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed because the Petitioner procedurally defaulted his claims before the state court, and was unable to demonstrate cause for the default. The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion for the proper reasons. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer [Docket No. 45, filed March 24, 2009] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court's findings and conclusions of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Motion for Enlargement Upon Bail Pending Resolution of Habeas Corpus Petition [Docket No. 43, filed Jan. 29, 2009] is Case No. 03-74144 Judge Denise Page Hood DENIED. S/Denise Page Hood Denise Page Hood United States District Judge Dated: May 28, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon Earnell Hailes, Reg. No. 324652, Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility, (IBC), 1727 W. Bluewater Hwy., Ionia, MI 48846 and counsel of record on May 28, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/William F. Lewis Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?