NetJumper Sofware L. L. C. v. Google, Incorporated
Filing
109
EX-PARTE ORDER ALLOWING ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT INTO COURTROOM. Signed by Honorable Julian Abele Cook. (KDoa)
NetJumper Sofware L. L. C. v. Google, Incorporated
Doc. 109
Case 2:04-cv-70366-JAC-RSW
Document 109
Filed 08/29/2007
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NETJUMPER SOFTWARE, L.L.C. a Michigan limited liability corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation Defendant. _______________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Kochanowski (P55117) Nabeel M. Hamameh (P60981) Sommers Schwartz, PC 2000 Town Center, Suite 900 Southfield, MI 48075 Michael H. Baniak McDonnell, Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP 300 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606 Attorneys for NetJumper Software, L.L.C. Kathleen A. Lang (P34695) L. Pahl Zinn (P57516) DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 4000 Detroit, MI 48226-3425 (313) 223-3500 Frank E. Scherkenbach FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110-2804 Howard G. Pollack FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Attorneys for Google Inc. EX-PARTE ORDER ALLOWING ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT INTO COURT ROOM OF HON. JULIAN ABELE COOK IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Google Inc. may bring the electronic equipment identified below into the court room of Hon. Julian Abele Cook, for a hearing scheduled on August 30, 2007 at 9:00 a.m.: 1. Two (2) IBM ThinkPad laptop computers; and Case No. 04-70366-CV Hon. Julian Abele Cook Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-70366-JAC-RSW
Document 109
Filed 08/29/2007
Page 2 of 2
2.
One (1) proxima projector.
Attorneys for Google Inc. shall present a True Copy of this Order to the United States Marshall upon entry to the court house. s/ Julian Abele Cook, Jr. District Court Judge Dated: August 29, 2007
DETROIT 28155-1 1006026v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?