NetJumper Sofware L. L. C. v. Google, Incorporated

Filing 120

Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief In Excess of Page Limit by Google, Incorporated. (Wolff, Jason)

NetJumper Sofware L. L. C. v. Google, Incorporated

Doc. 120

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NETJUMPER SOFTWARE, L.L.C. a Michigan limited liability corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation Defendant. _______________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Kochanowski SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, PC 2000 Town Center, Suite 900 Southfield, MI 48075 Michael H. Baniak Gary E. Hood MCDONNEL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF, LLP 300 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Attorneys for NetJumpe Software, L.L.C. Kathleen A. Lang (P34695) L. Pahl Zinn (P57516) DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 4000 Detroit, MI 48226-3425 [phone] Frank E. Scherkenbach FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110-2804 Howard G. Pollack FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Jason W. Wolff FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Attorneys for Google Inc. EX PARTE MOTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN EXCESS OF FIVE PAGE LIMIT Civil Action No. 04-70366-CV Hon. Julian Abele Cook Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

Dockets.Justia.com

NOW COMES Google Inc., by its attorneys, and moves this Court pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(c)(3)(A) for leave to file a reply brief in support of its Motion To Stay Pending Resolution of the Reexamination Proceedings Before the United States Patent Office and Trademark Office, or in the Alternative to Continue the Trial Date Until Late September or Early October (Dkt. No. 115) that exceeds the page limit. In support of this ex-parte motion, Google states as follows: 1. Google's motion to stay or in the alternative to continue the trial date (Dkt. Nos.

115) involves opposition to numerous arguments raised by NetJumper in its response brief (Dkt. No. 119), some of which Google believes to be misrepresentations of the record and have no merit, and accordingly require additional pages to address completely. 2. to the Court. WHEREFORE, Google respectfully request this Court enter the Order that has been submitted through the ECF system granting Google leave of the Court to file a reply brief in excess of the limit set by the E.D. Mich. LR 7.1. Respectfully submitted, FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Jason W. Wolff 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Google Inc Google will endeavor to use the fewest pages possible in presenting its arguments

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 13, 2008, I electronically filed Defendant Google Inc.'s EX PARTE MOTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN EXCESS OF FIVE PAGE LIMIT, with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notice of such filing upon the following attorneys: ANDREW KOCHANOWSKI and MICHAEL H. BANIAK. By: /s/ Jason W. Wolff FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 [phone] [e-mail]

3