NetJumper Sofware L. L. C. v. Google, Incorporated
Filing
56
WITNESS LIST by NetJumper Software, L. L. C., NetJumper Software, L. L. C. (Hamameh, Nabeel)
NetJumper Sofware L. L. C. v. Google, Incorporated
Doc. 56
Case 2:04-cv-70366-JAC-RSW
Document 56
Filed 10/10/2005
Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NETJUMPER SOFTWARE, L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability corporation, Plaintiff, vs.
(248) 355-0300
Case No. 04-70366-CV Hon. Julian Abele Cook Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________/ SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, PC DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC Andrew Kochanowski (P55117) Kathleen A. Lang (P34695) Nabeel N. Hamameh (P60981) L. Pahl Zinn (P57516) Attorneys For Plaintiff Attorneys For Defendant 2000 Town Center, 9th Floor 500 Woodward Ave., Ste. 4000 Southfield, MI 48075 Detroit, MI 48226 (248) 355-0300 (313) 223-3500 BANIAK, PINE & GANNON Michael Baniak Co-Counsel For Plaintiff 150 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1200 Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 673-0360 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Howard G. Pollack Attorneys For Defendant 500 Arguello Street, Ste. 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 (650) 839-5070
2000 TOWN CENTER
LAW OFFICES SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. SUITE 900 SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48075
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Frank E. Scherkenbach 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110-2804 (617) 542-5070 ______________________________________________________________________/ PLAINTIFF NETJUMPER SOFTWARE, LLC S WITNESS LIST Plaintiff, Netjumper Software, LLC, hereby submits the following witness list of those individuals who may be called to testify at trial of the above-captioned matter: 1. Gilbert Borman
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-70366-JAC-RSW
Document 56
Filed 10/10/2005
Page 2 of 3
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
(248) 355-0300
Anup Mathur Rajat Bhatnagar Mukesh Kumar Mark Lahti, Esq. Bernard Galler (expert) Richard Grauer (expert) Phillip Green (expert) Creighton Hoffman (expert) Breen Hagan (adverse) Steve Schimmel (adverse) Larry Page (adverse) Sergey Brin (adverse) Eric Schmidt (adverse) Alex Franz (adverse) Eric Frederickson (adverse) Susan Wijiski (adverse) Omid Kordestani (adverse) Celeste Chung (adverse) Karen Bapni (adverse) John Piscetello (adverse) Hubert Pan (adverse) Any and all witnesses whose identities become known during the course of discovery.
8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.
2000 TOWN CENTER
LAW OFFICES SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. SUITE 900 SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48075
2
Case 2:04-cv-70366-JAC-RSW
Document 56
Filed 10/10/2005
Page 3 of 3
24. 25. 26. 27.
Any and all necessary foundation witnesses. Any necessary rebuttal witnesses, expert or fact. Any and all witnesses identified on Defendant Google Inc. s witness list. Plaintiff Netjumper Software, LLC reserves the right to further amend this witness list as the identity of additional witnesses become known. Respectfully submitted,
(248) 355-0300
SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. s/ Nabeel N. Hamameh (P60981) Nabeel N. Hamameh (P60981) 2000 Town Center, Suite 900 Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 355-0300
LAW OFFICES SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. SUITE 900 SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48075
Dated: October 10, 2005
PROOF OF SERVICE I certify that on October 10, 2005, I electronically filed the forgoing paper with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Kathleen A. Lang; klang@dickinsonwright.com L. Pahl Zinn; pzinn@dickinsonwright.com Michael H. Baniak; baniak@bpglaw.com and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service First Class Mail the paper to the following non-ECF participants: FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Howard G. Pollack 500 Arguello Street, Ste. 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Frank E. Scherkenbach 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110-2804 s/Nabeel N. Hamameh (P60981) Sommers Schwartz, PC 2000 Town Center, Suite 900 Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 355-0300 nhamameh@sommerspc.com
2000 TOWN CENTER
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?