United States of America v. Eli Harvey
ORDER Adopting 129 Report and Recommendation, Denying 115 Motion to Stay filed by Eli Harvey - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Paul D. Borman
United States District Judge
R. Steven Whalen
United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHALEN’S APRIL 10, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 129); (2) DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY WRIT OF GARNISHMENT AND FOR
EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ECF NO. 115), AND (3) ORDERING
DEFENDANT TO OBTAIN LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE ANY FURTHER
MOTION WITH REGARD TO GARNISHMENT OF THE PIC GROUP, INC.
On April 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Steven R. Whalen issued a Report and
Recommendation to DENY Defendant’s Motion to Stay Writ of Garnishment and to
Conduct A Show Cause and Evidentiary Hearing. The Magistrate Judge further
recommended that Defendant be required to obtain leave of Court before filing any
further motion with regard to the garnishment of his employer, the PIC Group, Inc.
(ECF No. 129, Report and Recommendation.) Having reviewed the Report and
Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D.
Mich L. R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 129),
and DENIES Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 115).
The Court FURTHER ORDERS that Defendant must obtain leave of Court before
filing any further motion with regard to the garnishment of his employer, PIC Group, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Paul D. Borman
PAUL D. BORMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 11, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each
attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on May
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?