Haddad v. Indiana Pacers et al

Filing 102

Costs Taxed in amount of $ 4,665.86 against plaintiff. (LBeh, )

Download PDF
Haddad v. Indiana Pacers et al Doc. 102 Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS Document 102 Filed 12/22/2006 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Charles Haddad Page 1 of 2 Civil No: 04-cv-74932 v. Judicial Officer: Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor Indiana Pacers, -et al / TAXED BILL OF COST On 10/24/2006, a judgment was entered in favor of defendants. The prevailing party now requests the clerk to tax the following costs: AMOUNT REQUESTED AMOUNT ALLOWED CLERK'S COMMENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fees of the Clerk (28:1920(1))(28:1923) Service Fees $150.00 $150.00 Court Reporter Fees $3,746.60 $3,652.35 No allowed: Shipping. See Handbook, pg. 5, G, 2, h. Printing Fees Witness Fees $863.51 $863.51 Exemplification & Copy Fees Deposition Related Costs Other costs TOTALS $ 4,760.11 $ 4,665.86 After the taxation clerk has taxed costs, counsel for either side may, within five (5) days, file objections. Date: December 22, 2006 David J. Weaver, Clerk s/ L. Behringer Deputy Clerk Rev. 8/99 Dockets.Justia.com Mailing Information for a Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. Brian M. Akkashian bakkashian@dickinsonwright.com Richard M. Apkarian RApkarian@dickinsonwright.com Lawrence S. Charfoos lcharfoos@c2law.com Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS Document 102 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 2 of 2 Thomas W. Cranmer cranmer@millercanfield.com Rouman@millercanfield.com,Christenson@millercanfield.com Matthew F. Leitman Leitman@millercanfield.com Kaszubski@millercanfield.com Rick J. Patterson rjpatterson@potterlaw.com Steven M. Potter spotter@potterlaw.com Hideaki Sano sano@millercanfield.com nychypor@millercanfield.com Jason J. Thompson jthompson@c2law.com swright@c2law.com,bbodner@c2law.com,mjtytran@c2law.com,pacotton

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?